Bitcoin developers who created the Taproot Upgrade didn’t take into account the “social attack surface” Bitcoin developer claims that the BRC-20s and Ordinals transactions, among others, were able to spam the Bitcoin network.
“What they ignore is that Taproot had significant trolling value as the upgrade that Bitcoiners were placing their hopes in,” Bitcoin Core developer Jimmy Song said On Sunday, X added the following:
“The increase in the social attack surface of this upgrade wasn’t accounted for at all, let alone considered.”
Song — who referred Orders as a “fiat scam” last year — claimed that Taproot has failed to live up to the hype because it didn’t deliver on the privacy and security features promised.
He cited Schnorr Signatures and Script Paths spend features as a better alternative to Multisig. In some cases, three out of five family or friends could help recover a Bitcoin Key. He said that it was even more complex because it took more signature rounds than multisig.
“Bad user experience basically made it a non-starter,” Song added. Taproot was activated Jonas Nick Tim Ruffing A.J. Townes, along with a handful of other Bitcoin Core developers, will be implementing the idea in November 2021. Gregory Maxwell introduced it in January 2018 and has since been building upon his work.
#vlog 27
Was Taproot A Wise Decision? pic.twitter.com/sUjtf8JA2z
— Jimmy Song (송재준) (@jimmysong) September 13, 2025
Song’s remarks come in the midst of a growing division among Bitcoiners about which transactions on the network should be validated or not.
Adam Back, Dennis Porter and Luke Dashjr are among the Bitcoiners who — like Song — prefer Bitcoin to focus on fixing money — and thus serve solely as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system, as Satoshi Nakamoto intended it to be used.
Other, like Bitcoin Ordinals leader “Leonidas,” Taproot is a powerful upgrade that allows you to easily create new websites. Ordinals and Runes applications, Among other things. Bitcoiners of this camp believe that Bitcoin doesn’t need to censor transactions.
Bitcoin Knots vs Bitcoin Core: The war of the Runes, Ordinals and Bitcoin core
In June, there were more than 30 Bitcoin Core developers Removed the 80 byte limit for the Internet OP_RETURN functionThe chain can store a lot more photos, documents, audio files, videos and other media.
But fears that Bitcoin Core — the leading Bitcoin software node operator — could U-turn on the update have sparked a shift to use Bitcoin Knots instead.
Bitcoin Knots has seen a significant increase in the number of nodes. 67 In March 2024, there will be 7,112 nodes. This represents nearly 28% today.
Related: Crypto isn’t Web 3.0, it’s Capitalism 2.0 — Crypto exec
Leonidas, a member of the Ordinals Community in Greece, said earlier this month that they may consider relocating to another country. forking Bitcoin Core It would be interesting to see if the developers decided to reverse the update in the near future and censor Ordinals, Runes, and non-financial network transactions.
Song still hasn’t abandoned Taproot upgrade
Song hasn’t dismissed Taproot as an option for Bitcoin, even though it hasn’t been able to meet his expectations.
“Taproot can, of course, redeem itself, maybe Ark ultimately decentralizes mining, maybe BitVM creates way more Bitcoin demand. But so far, Taproot has not lived up to the cost users paid to get it.”
Leonidas claims that the use of runes and ordinals has strengthened Bitcoin’s security.
Leonidas, meanwhile, has said that Ordinals and Runes contributed more than $500 million to transaction fees. strengthen Bitcoin’s security — something which has become an increasing concern as the network’s mining block subsidy continues to halve every four or so years.
Dune Analytics estimates that the daily fees from Ordinals fees will range from $3,060 in 2019 to $537.400 by 2025. data shows.
Bitcoin miners will earn a record-breaking $9.99,000,000 from Ordinals by Dec. 16 2023.
Magazine: Astrology could make you a better crypto trader: It has been foretold
“This article is not financial advice.”
“Always do your own research before making any type of investment.”
“ItsDailyCrypto is not responsible for any activities you perform outside ItsDailyCrypto.”
Source: cointelegraph.com

