TL;DR
- Crypto Rover states that Bitcoin never fell below current electrical production cost of $47,000.
- The models do not set a price floor, but can be used to help determine the risk of a downward move.
- Models’ usefulness depends on many factors, including electricity costs, miner performance, market liquidity, and difficulty adjustments.
Bitcoin has never been able to fall below the cost of electricity.
Electricity cost in the United States: $47,000
Take notes 📝 pic.twitter.com/8vCu53QVm1
— Crypto Rover (@cryptorover) June 12, 2026
Bitcoin Mining Costs Chart: Bitcoin Floor is Near $47,000
Crypto Rover shared an image of a Bitcoin-mining cost chart, claiming that BTC never fell below the estimated electric production costs. The post puts this at $47,000.
According to the argument, Bitcoin production becomes less and less profitable below that price. According to the framing of the post, $47,000 represents a significant floor for BTC.
Some analysts have used production-cost models to calculate the downside risks of Bitcoin for many years. The models are useful, because they can help to understand the economics of mining, which is based on network difficulty and hash rates, as well as hardware efficiency and electric prices.
What is the Mining Cost?
Bitcoin’s production costs are not universal. The cost of electricity varies dramatically depending on the region, mining scale, energy contracts, hardware production and operational efficiency. Costs for an industrial miner using cheap electricity may differ significantly from those of a smaller operator who uses expensive grid energy.
Over time, adjustments to difficulty can also affect the economy. The network could rebalance if inefficient miner shut down following a price decline, thus reducing pressure on the remaining miners. The production cost will be dynamic, rather than being a static line.
Crypto Rover also poses a risk to itself because his articles are often framed in a bullish manner. It is important to note that the $47,000 price level should be considered a cost-model, not a bottom.
You Can Tell the Market by Level
If BTC does approach the claimed band of electrical costs, then how will miners react? Cost-floor discussions would become more relevant if the hash price dropped, or if miner’s stress increased.
Charts that show Bitcoin staying well above or below the level may reinforce the view of miner economies as still being supportive. This model is put under more pressure if BTC falls below or toward the level.
Mining-cost models are useful for framing downside risks, but work best when used as one of many inputs. The spot ETF flow, derivatives leverage and macro liquidity, as well as broader crypto-risk appetite, can overpower the simplified production cost line.
The report is based upon the attributed X posting and should not be interpreted as a price prediction. View the source post.
It is crucial that traders use this chart as a map of risk. An estimate of production costs can indicate where miners may experience stress, but cannot prevent forced selling, macroshocks, or leverage unwinds. It is a useful indicator, but not a guarantee of prevailing market conditions.
“This article is not financial advice.”
“Always do your own research before making any type of investment.”
“ItsDailyCrypto is not responsible for any activities you perform outside ItsDailyCrypto.”
Source: www.newsbtc.com
