Security companies and cryptocurrency wallet manufacturers are promoting post-quantum technology, even though quantum computers large enough to break Bitcoin have not yet been developed.
NIST is the US National Institute of Standards and Technology finalized The first standard for quantum cryptography will be released in 2024.
While standard bodies are planning for an eventual cryptographic shift, some wallet markets have already begun to monetize that future.
“I do feel that it is a bit of a fear tax. We know that quantum computers are far away — still five to 15 years away,” Alexei Zamyatin is the co-founder and CEO of Build on bitcoin (BOB), according to Cointelegraph.
Bitcoin has fallen by about 50% from its peak in October 2025. Quantum computing is one of the many theories attempting an explanation for crypto’s recent drop. deterring institutional capital from Bitcoin.
Quantum risks are not zero. They also do not occur suddenly
Bitcoin’s Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm which is used to authorize transactions, has been dubbed the most common quantum vulnerability. A powerful quantum computer, in theory, could deduce a secret key from a public key exposed and steal the coins stored at an address.
The quantum hardware available today can’t break the signatures of elliptic curves. This doesn’t necessarily mean that threat actors will wait around for the next technological breakthrough.
“Many users expect a single ‘Q-Day’ in the future when cryptography suddenly fails. In reality, risk accumulates gradually as cryptographic assumptions weaken and exposure increases,” Kapil Dhiman told Cointelegraph that he is CEO of Quranium and the co-founder.
“Harvest now, decrypt-later strategies are already active, meaning data and signatures exposed today are being collected against future capability,” “He said”
Related: What if quantum computers already broke Bitcoin?
Bitcoin has older keys exposed. A public key that appears onchain remains visible forever. Modern address formats conceal public keys until the coins have been spent.
Christopher Bendiksen of CoinShares Bitcoin said that 10,230 Bitcoins are worth (BTC) sit in addresses with publicly exposed public keys This would make it vulnerable to an attack of sufficient power.

Quantum fear is a business.
While Bitcoiners debate the quantum computer’s future, makers of crypto wallets are on their own schedule.
Trezor Safe 7 comes in a variety of colors. “quantum-ready” Hardware wallet. Separately qLabs introduced recently the Quantum Sig wallet that embeds quantum signatures into its sign-process.

BOB’s Zamyatin said that wallet-level defences will not be able to solve Bitcoin’s risk of quantum. Bitcoin transactions are verified using an embedded signature scheme. The fix for a cryptographic failure would need a protocol change.
“I personally wouldn’t invest a lot of money into a quantum wallet right now because I don’t even know what protection it gives me for Bitcoin. It can’t really give me any protection, in my opinion, because Bitcoin doesn’t have a quantum-resistant signature scheme yet.”
Ada Jonušė, executive director at qLabs, agreed that full quantum resilience requires protocol-level defense. Modern infrastructure is not a tax on fear, but it can be viewed as such.
“Quantum risk is not binary. Even before a protocol-level migration occurs, there is a real ‘harvest now, decrypt later’ threat,” Cointelegraph quoted her as saying that qLabs’ approach reduced the surface exposed to keys.
“Quantum readiness is about proactive infrastructure planning, not fear monetization,” Jonušė said.
Related: Bitcoin’s quantum countdown has already begun, Naoris CEO says
Trezor has also acknowledged that the blockchains need to be re-designed. change their cryptography and protocol. But Tomáš Sušánka, the company’s chief technology officer, told Cointelegraph that wallets can implement protections right away instead of waiting for protracted blockchain upgrades.
“Once the blockchains upgrade, wallets must also support the same algorithms to remain compatible,” Sušánka said. He said that Trezor Safe 7 is using a post quantum algorithm to prevent future quantum computers from forging digital signs and signing malicious firmware upgrades.
Bitcoin governance and market incentives
Hardware wallets and security products have a longer product lifespan than iPhones. The introduction of post-quantum functions in a product can give customers an incentive to upgrade, even though the threat may be distant.
“Yes, parts of the crypto industry do have incentives to amplify quantum risk, but that incentive is increasingly driven by regulatory and institutional alignment, not short-term sales alone,” Dhiman’s Quranium is the power behind Qsafe, said Dhiman.
“For most users, quantum-secure wallets today function as long-term insurance. The responsible approach is to acknowledge the transition ahead, avoid urgency driven by fear and choose systems designed to evolve without forcing abrupt replacements.”
Bitcoin, however, has been fairly hesitant. Some of the most influential voices on the network have dismissed the threat as a problem for the future.
Ethereum, unlike Bitcoin, has a well-known figurehead. Co-founder Vitalik Buterin has advocated for post-quantum preparations. And the network has been heading that way.
Zamyatin says that the key to Bitcoin is the social consensus and willingness to act.
“It’s not like [Bitcoin has] one person that everyone will follow. It will require a broad social consensus, which is very hard to achieve,” “He said”
All wallet manufacturers agree that the protocol is required to offer full quantum security. Even if it is years from now, the protocol can help to provide investors with peace of mind.
Magazine: Is China hoarding gold so yuan becomes global reserve instead of USD?
Cointelegraph Features and Cointelegraph Magazine feature long-form journalism and analytical reporting, produced by Cointelegraph’s own editorial team as well as selected external contributors. Cointelegraph editors review and edit all articles to ensure they meet our standards. The contributions of external writers reflect their expertise, research and perspective. Cointelegraph does not endorse the opinions expressed by these contributors unless it is explicitly stated. Features and Magazine do not provide financial, investment or legal advice. The reader should do their own research, and, if necessary consult with qualified professionals. Cointelegraph is completely independent in its editorial decisions. Advertising, commercial partnerships, and partners have no impact on editorial decisions, including the commissioning of features and magazine content, and their publication.
“This article is not financial advice.”
“Always do your own research before making any type of investment.”
“ItsDailyCrypto is not responsible for any activities you perform outside ItsDailyCrypto.”
Source: cointelegraph.com

