The shift in gold correlation adds to traders’ concerns about the $358M Bitcoin Outflow.

Takeaways from the conference:

• Bitcoin ETF losses and a decline of 31% from their peak are raising doubts. But metrics suggest that institutional investors have not abandoned Bitcoin.

• Bitcoin’s changing correlation with gold, and its constant volatility, suggest that the price is not affected by short-term market pressure.

BitcoinBTCAfter selling at the $85,000 mark on Monday, grew by 3%. The increase in withdrawals from spot Bitcoin exchange traded funds seems to indicate that institutional investors’ demand has weakened since the crash of October 10. The likelihood that Bitcoin will trade above $100,000 before year’s end is reduced.

Spot Bitcoin ETFs reported $358 Million in Net Outflows Monday. It was the largest withdrawal day in more than three weeks. It fueled speculations that institutional investors may be cutting back on their Bitcoin exposure now that the $90,000 psychological level has been breached. 

Bitcoin, however, is trading at a 31% discount to its record high price of $126,219, and this pullback could indicate the end of the bullish period that continued into October.

According to X user ‘forcethehabit’, Bitcoin’s decline does not represent a trend change, as interest rate cuts have been delayed and the US Federal Reserve (Fed) has reduced its balance sheet for longer than expected. This analysis shows that the majority of institutional capital has entered through ETFs, corporate reserves and other forms of investment. However, there have been no signs yet for a rotation to riskier assets.

Bitcoin’s correlation with gold is inconsistent

Bitcoin’s correlation to gold can be used as a way of assessing whether it is seen as an alternative asset store or merely a proxy for riskier assets. Bitcoin’s rise has been driven by a digital gold narrative since the year 2025.

It is important to note that Bitcoin’s 48% performance underperformance compared with gold has been a concern since July. Since May, the 60-day correlation has fluctuated between positives and negatives. This indicates that Bitcoin’s and gold’s price trends are not consistent. Bitcoin traders were undoubtedly disappointed when the level of $110,000 was lost.

The correlation index was not affected by the decline of 31% in Bitcoin prices since October. The argument that investors’ risk perception has changed is weaker. Bitcoin can still thrive as an independent decentralized system of finance, while gold continues to be the most valuable store in the world, valued at an estimated $30 trillion.

It also seems premature to conclude that institutional money has abandoned Bitcoin based solely on a 10-week correction, especially since Bitcoin has outperformed the S&P 500 index by 7% over the past 18 months. Bitcoin’s risk profile for options is very similar to Nvidia US (NVDA US), Broadcom US (AVGO US), and two of the eight biggest companies in the world by market capitalization.

The implied volatility of Bitcoin options peaked in November at roughly 53%, which is similar to the level currently being experienced by Tesla (TSLA USA). The higher the implied volatility, the more traders are anticipating sharp price movements. The market maker tends to lower their exposure to risk when price surprises are more probable. This does not, however, mean that investors have gone bearish.

No indication exists that investors are no longer expecting Bitcoin to hit $100,000 within the next few months. The correlation and volatility metrics indicate that Bitcoin’s behavior is not significantly different following its 30% drop. Therefore, a few ETF outflows in the last couple of days should not be emphasized. Markets are still adjusting to the impact of the US Fed’s recent injection of liquidity, so it is premature to evaluate Bitcoin performance.

This article was written for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, investment or tax advice. Views, thoughts and opinions are those of the writer and not Cointelegraph. Cointelegraph strives to deliver accurate, timely, and reliable information. However, Cointelegraph cannot guarantee that the information contained in this article is complete, accurate, or reliable. This article contains forward-looking statements, which may be subject to uncertainties and risks. Cointelegraph cannot be held responsible for damages or losses arising out of your reliance upon this information.