21Shares’s application for an ONDO ETF brought the token to the forefront. ONDO has been trading near its local lows for the last few weeks despite a dramatic gap between story and structure.
Ondo [ONDO] The price of the coin has increased by approximately 8% within the past 24-hours, pushing towards the $0.25 range. It’s worth noting that the price of ONDO has also appreciated on charts in the past 24 hours. It is therefore not clear whether this news announcement had any effect on ONDO.
The buyers were following the momentum of the market, and not a new ONDO. At press time, the market price was still well below its previous structural lows, even though it had been bound. Sellers were aggressively defending any resurgences.
The control of the market’s downside was reinforced by previous failures to recover zones higher than those currently in place. The volatility briefly increased during the surge in market prices, but then it compressed. This behavior indicates responsiveness and not accumulation.
While the ETF’s headline provides visibility, other market factors continue to influence short-term prices.
Sellers defend broken structure despite slowing momentum
The price of ONDO remains pressured as the sellers defend structurally broken levels and keep downside risks active.
At the time of writing, the daily chart revealed repeated rejection below the $0.356 zone – A level that previously acted as support. Price failed repeatedly to return above that price level after it had been lost.
This area of $0.20 was identified as the major next demand zone. It matched the consolidation and reaction to long-wicks that occurred earlier. Selling will continue to increase the risk of a downward move.
Altcoins’ momentum indicators appeared to confirm and highlight its poor follow-throughs as well.
TradingView
The leverage of traders is reduced as they step back
As traders reduced their exposure to derivatives, they also decreased the number of participants. Total derivatives volume dropped by 40.51% to $227.96 million – Evidence of a sharp contraction in speculative activity.
As a result, the Open Interest dropped by 1.50% and reached $68.52 millions. A combination like this is more likely to be a result of reducing leverage than aggressive positions. The traders closed their positions rather than chasing the downside or rushing to gain an advantage. The derivatives market’s confidence seemed to be fading.
Open Interest didn’t collapse completely. This suggests that the disengagement was more selective than it was panic. There was also some liquidity, though it seemed to be thinner. This means that less capital will be required to cause volatility in price.
Source: CoinGlass
Shorts gain control as funding tilts to the downside
The flipping of OI-weighted financing to the negative confirms growing short-side dominance on all ONDO derivatives market.
It was near -0.0024% at the time of press, which forced longs to cover shorts. A skew of this magnitude often indicates that traders tend to favor scenarios for continued downside rather than those for rebound.
However, funding does not stay negative indefinitely without consequences. Short positions that are crowded can increase the sensitivity of the market to volatility.
The price has also failed to return to its previous resistance level on the charts. This confirms the bearish mood. In other words, the funding rates reflect a consensus-driven bias and not merely timing signals. Once the price starts to move, they increase volatility while enhancing defensive positions.
Source: CoinGlass
Liquidation zones tighten around price
The heatmap of liquidation revealed dense clusters of leverage that defined ONDO’s immediate risks boundaries. The clusters of heavy liquidity on the short side were located above $0.27 where leverage was tightly stacked.
The price of the stock was trading at just over these lower bands. In this case, the breakdown of long-term positions could lead to a cascading effect. A sharp return to $0.26, however, would put pressure on short positions.
This structure can trap traders within a tight volatility corridor. As leverage increases, liquidity hunts are more likely. Direction is therefore less important that movement. If the price leaves this range, liquidations may accelerate quickly.
Source: CoinGlass
Although the ETF filing brought ONDO back into the spotlight, market structures will continue to drive price behaviour.
Negative funding, collapsing volumes of derivatives and repeated rejections under $0.356 all indicate defensive positions rather than accumulation.
At the same, tight clustering in liquidation raises volatility risks without improving confidence. As a result, the ETF headline is treated as speculative background, rather than a catalyst.
ONDO is still vulnerable to downside pressure until the price structure that has been broken with participation is reclaimed.
Conclusions
- ONDO’s story has been improved by ETF transparency, but the price structure still determines trader’s behavior.
- Defensive position implied that traders would respect the downside risk despite increased attention and short term rebounds.
“This article is not financial advice.”
“Always do your own research before making any type of investment.”
“ItsDailyCrypto is not responsible for any activities you perform outside ItsDailyCrypto.”
Source: ambcrypto.com
